ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Risk stratification and anal cancer screening in immunocompetent women with genital HPV: Value of multicentric HSIL and performance of HPV-based screening.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stratifying the risk of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion among immunosuppressed women with genital HPV.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is rising, and women with genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection or HPV-associated high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) are at high risk of developing ASCC. We conducted a cross-sectional study including 354 immunocompetent women referred for anal evaluation because of HPV infection or HSIL of the lower genital tract between 2019 and 2024. Participants were categorized according to the genital site affected by HSIL (uterine cervix, vagina, vulva/perineum/perianal region, or multicentric disease), and a control group of 99 immunocompetent women with genital HPV infection and/or low-grade SIL was included. All patients underwent anal high-risk HPV testing, liquid-based cytology, and high-resolution anoscopy when indicated. Overall, high-risk HPV infection and HSIL were identified in the anal canal in 62.5% and 5.6% of women, respectively. Women with multicentric disease showed a higher prevalence of anal HSIL compared with the control group (6/29, 20.7%, vs. 2/99, 2.0%; p = .031), and the other genital HSIL groups (11/182, 6.0% for cervical; 0/13, 0%, for vaginal; 1/31, 3.2% for vulvar HSIL; p = .003). Genital HSIL, particularly multicentric disease, was a strong marker of anal involvement. No HSIL/AIN occurred among women with a negative anal high-risk HPV test. Anal high-risk HPV testing alone showed optimal sensitivity (100%) and negative predictive value (100%) for the diagnosis of HSIL/AIN, whereas cytology alone had lower sensitivity (68.4%). Combining both tests did not improve accuracy and resulted in excessive referrals. High-risk HPV testing alone appears to be the most efficient approach for anal screening in women with genital HSIL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.