Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41944651›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2026

Pediatric tracheostomy-associated respiratory infections: an evolving paradigm.

John M Morrison, Rebecca Steuart, Christopher J Russell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John M MorrisonDivision of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, Saint Petersburg, Florida.
Rebecca SteuartSection of Complex Care, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin.
Christopher J RussellDivision of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewChildren with tracheostomy frequently experience tracheostomy-associated infections (TRAINs) such as pneumonia and tracheitis. This review will summarize current evidence regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of TRAINs. RECENT

findingsRecent evidence highlights limitations of respiratory culture testing in the face of a diverse, dynamic bacterial community within the airways of children with tracheostomy, challenging the notion that a positive bacterial culture is sufficient for diagnosing bacterial TRAIN. For this reason, recent consensus guidelines recommend against the routine obtainment of respiratory cultures for TRAIN diagnosis in the absence of specific clinical symptoms. Additional evidence for microbiome shifts and host inflammation as diagnostic tools may help identify those who will benefit from antibiotic treatment. Recent findings support selective anaerobic coverage when aspiration is suspected and suggest shorter antibiotic courses may be effective. Cycled inhaled tobramycin shows potential for reducing TRAIN frequency and related hospitalizations. SUMMARY: With recent advances in TRAIN pathobiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of TRAINs is undergoing a paradigm shift. Future translational research will define the airway microbiome during TRAINs and during wellness and its impact on host inflammation. Antibiotic clinical trials are needed to optimize treatment and prevention of TRAINs.

Indexed as

Respiratory Tract InfectionsTracheitisTracheostomyAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildHumansMicrobiotaAnti-Bacterial Agentsmicrobiomepneumoniatracheitistracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID41944651
PMCPMC13152059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.