Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41944570›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Score Matching for Differential Abundance Testing of Compositional High-Throughput Sequencing Data.

Johannes Ostner, Hongzhe Li, Christian L Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johannes OstnerComputational Health Center, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6448-9437
Hongzhe LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christian L MüllerComputational Health Center, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Microbiome and MetagenomicsR01GM123056 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LEE, HONGZHE · 2017 to 2025
$3.7M
Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft ZT-I-PF-5-138NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123056NIH HHS R01GM123056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The class of a-b power interaction models, proposed by [1], provides a general framework for modeling sparse compositional data with pairwise feature interactions. This class includes many distributions as special cases and enables modeling of zero entries through power transformations, making it particularly suitable for modern high-throughput sequencing data with excess zeros, including single-cell RNA-Seq and microbial amplicon data. Here, we present an extension of this class of models that allows inclusion of covariate information, thus enabling accurate characterization of covariate dependencies in heterogeneous populations. Combining this model with a tailored differential abundance (DA) test leads to a novel DA testing scheme, cosmoDA, that can reduce the false positive detection rate caused by correlated features. cosmoDA uses penalized generalized score matching for parsimonious model fitting. We show on simulated benchmarks that cosmoDA can accurately estimate feature interactions in the presence of population heterogeneity and significantly reduces the false discovery rate when testing for differential abundance of correlated features. Using single-cell and amplicon data, we illustrate cosmoDA's ability to estimate data-adaptive Box-Cox-type data transformations and assess the impact of zero replacement and power transformations on downstream differential abundance results. cosmoDA is available at https://github.com/bio-datascience/cosmoDA.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingModels, StatisticalComputer SimulationHumansSingle-Cell Analysiscompositional datadifferential abundancegenerative modelmicrobiomescore matchingsingle‐cell RNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41944570
PMCPMC13055433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.