Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41944517›Full record

ArticleVeterinary ophthalmology2026

A Comparative Analysis of Deep Convolutional Networks for Automated Diagnosis of Retinal Detachment in Dogs.

Sıtkıcan Okur, Büşra Baykal, Yasemin Akçora, Esra Modoğlu, Büşra Kibar, Murat İlgün, Emre Eren, Latif Emrah Yanmaz

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sıtkıcan OkurFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Surgery, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2620-897X
Büşra BaykalFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Surgery, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2787-1249
Yasemin AkçoraFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Surgery, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6104-8393
Esra ModoğluFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Surgery, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0506-8999
Büşra KibarFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Surgery, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1490-8832
Murat İlgünDVM Graduate, Veterinary Clinic, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0062-2825
Emre ErenFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3118-7384
Latif Emrah YanmazFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Surgery, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5890-8271

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare ImageNet-pretrained deep convolutional neural networks for automated detection of retinal detachment (RD) in canine fundus photographs. ANIMALS STUDIED: Archived fundus images from 275 dogs. PROCEDURES: In this multicenter retrospective study, 2000 color fundus photographs (793 RD; 1207 normal) acquired between 2020 and 2025 were included after quality filtering. Data were split at the patient level into training (80%) and an independent validation set (20%). Transfer learning was applied to three pretrained architectures (ResNet50V2, VGG16, EfficientNetB0) using standardized preprocessing and real-time augmentation. Performance on the validation set was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals were estimated by bootstrapping.

resultsResNet50V2 achieved the best overall discrimination (accuracy 0.8909; AUC 0.9194), followed by EfficientNetB0 (accuracy 0.8182; AUC 0.8831). VGG16 showed limited reliability (accuracy 0.6182; AUC 0.6868) due to a high false-positive rate. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping indicated that the best-performing model consistently attended to regions consistent with retinal detachment.

conclusionsResNet50V2-based analysis of canine fundus photographs shows strong potential as a scalable screening support tool for RD. Prospective external validation across additional devices and practice settings is warranted before routine clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Convolutional Neural NetworksDog DiseasesRetinal DetachmentAnimalsDogsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studiescaninecomputer visionconvolutional neural networkfundus photographyscreeningveterinary ophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID41944517
PMCPMC13055114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.