Observational studyJournal of clinical nursing2026
Correlates of Patient and Nurse Missed Care: A Multi-Hospital Cross-Sectional Study.
Observational study in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perceptions and experiences of missed nursing care among junior nurses: a qualitative study using reflexive thematic analysis.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo determine the prevalence of missed care in inpatient surgical wards and to examine the causes and consequences of missed care from the perspectives of patients and nurses.
designThis study employed a descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional design.
methodsThis study was conducted over 3 days in November 2023 and included 354 patients and 89 nurses working in surgical wards of city hospitals. Data were collected using the Patient and Nurse Identifying Information Form, the MISSCARE Survey-Patient, and the MISSCARE Survey-Nurse. The data were analysed using SPSS. The study was reported in accordance with the STROBE checklist.
resultsPatients reported that oral care, body care and mobilization were care activities that were most frequently not performed. Patients' educational level and age did not affect the MISSCARE Survey-Patient scores, whereas duration of hospitalization and gender had a significant effect on the scores. According to nurses, the most frequently missed nursing care need was turning the patient every 2 h. Nurses also reported that an insufficient number of auxiliary and technical personnel, as well as unexpected increases in patient numbers and workload intensity in the unit, were major reasons for missed care. Gender, educational level, job satisfaction, age, years of employment, and weekly working hours did not significantly affect the MISSCARE Survey-Nurse scores of the nurses.
conclusionThe results indicate that missed nursing care is a significant problem from both patient and nurse perspectives. Communication deficiencies and insufficient staffing negatively affect the quality of care. Health institutions should focus on improving communication, staffing levels, and teamwork to enhance care quality. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL NURSING PRACTICE AND PATIENT CARE: This study highlights the persistent issue of missed care from both patient and nurse perspectives. The findings demonstrate that basic care needs, such as oral hygiene, mobilization, and personal care, are frequently unmet. Contributing factors including communication breakdowns, insufficient staffing, and workload imbalance were identified. These results underscore the need for nursing managers to reassess resource allocation, strengthen interdisciplinary communication, and support care planning strategies that prioritize fundamental care. The study offers valuable guidance for clinical nurses and nurse leaders aiming to enhance patient safety and improve the quality of care in surgical wards. IMPACT STATEMENT: The findings of this multi-centre study may inform nursing management practices in acute surgical settings, particularly in middle- and low-resource health systems where staffing shortages are common. The dual-perspective approach, incorporating both patient and nurse views, provides a more comprehensive understanding of care gaps. This perspective may influence policy decisions, staff allocation and training programs. The results may also guide future interventions aimed at reducing adverse patient outcomes associated with missed care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: Patients participated in this study by completing the MISSCARE Survey-Patient tool and sharing their experiences of missed care needs during hospitalization. Their perspectives were essential in identifying gaps in basic nursing care and potential adverse events associated with care omissions. Although patients were not involved in the study design or data analysis, their contributions informed the interpretation of the findings and supported the development of practice recommendations aimed at improving person-centred care in surgical wards. REPORTING
methodThis study was reported in accordance with the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) checklist for cross-sectional studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.