ArticleStudies in family planning2026
Traditional or Modern Contraception? Association Between Health Worker Contact and Contraceptive Choice in India: Findings From NFHS 2019-2021.
Article in Studies in family planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite greater availability and affordability of modern contraception, the use of traditional contraception is rising in India. We examined the relationship between Indian women's contact with a community health worker (CHW) and discussion of family planning (FP) with their contraceptive use. We analyzed data from 306,037 nonpregnant, non-sterilized married women in the 2019-2021 National Family Health Survey (NFHS). Multinomial regression models estimated the association between CHW contact and contraceptive use (consistent use, switching, and discontinuation) in the past three months. Nearly 22 percent of women reported current use of traditional contraception, with 18 percent reporting exclusive use and 4.1 percent concurrent method use. Traditional contraception was more common among older women, women with lower education, higher parity, and in nuclear households. CHW discussion on FP was associated with higher traditional contraceptive use [Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 1.11 (95 percent Confidence Interval (CI): 1.04, 1.19)], reversible modern method use [AOR = 1.92 (95 percent CI: 1.82, 2.02)], and concurrent use [AOR = 2.19 (95 percent CI: 1.95, 2.45)]. Recent CHW engagement was associated with consistent modern method use [Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio (ARRR) = 2.02 (95 percent CI: 1.91, 2.13)], switching from traditional to modern method [ARRR = 1.67 (95 percent CI: 1.14, 2.46)], and discontinuation of modern contraception [ARRR = 2.10 (95 percent CI: 1.81, 2.44)]. CHW engagement on FP may enable initiation and consistent use of traditional and modern methods, switching, and discontinuation of contraception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.