ArticleEuropean thyroid journal2026
Study of French inter-expert variability in thyroid nodule ultrasound.
Article in European thyroid journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Thyroid nodule ultrasound, conducted in France using the EU-TIRADS framework, is an essential tool for the management of these potentially malignant lesions. However, recent studies have suggested significant inter-reader variability in the description of sonographic features that form the foundation of EU-TIRADS scoring. To assess the impact of this variability in France, this work examines inter-reader differences among experienced French practitioners in assigning EU-TIRADS scores and sonographic feature labels to images acquired during routine clinical practice. Methods: A total of 303 axial-view ultrasound images of thyroid nodules were collected from four practice sites in France, including both private clinics and university hospitals. Each image was reviewed independently by four experts with at least 15 years of experience, who assigned both sonographic feature labels and an EU-TIRADS score to it. The inter-reader variability was assessed for each score and label, along with an evaluation of individual expert tendencies. Results: The results indicate a substantial degree of inter-expert variability in both the identification of individual features and the assignment of an EU-TIRADS score. The most heavily marked disagreements concerned nodule echogenicity, the presence of punctate echogenic foci, and nodule shape. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the current state of practice for ultrasound-based thyroid nodule diagnosis in France may suffer from substantial inter-expert variability in the identification of key sonographic features and the attribution of EU-TIRADS scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.