ReviewHand (New York, N.Y.)2026
Systematic Review of Leiomyomas of the Upper Extremity: Evaluating the Role of Ultrasound in Preoperative Diagnosis.
Review in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leiomyomas are rare tumors that can occur in various locations, including the upper extremity. Their resemblance to other soft tissue masses can complicate diagnosis, making preoperative imaging essential. This systematic review and case review from our institution evaluates the diagnosis and treatment of upper extremity leiomyomas, with a focus on ultrasound as an underused but valuable diagnostic tool. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and The Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to February 1, 2025. Data extracted included presenting symptoms, lesion location, diagnostic tools, histopathology, treatments, and patient outcomes. A total of 1268 articles were reviewed, yielding 105 manuscripts covering 212 cases of upper extremity leiomyomas. The mean age was 48.4 years, with a male predominance (60.7%). Leiomyomas were symptomatic for an average of 58.1 months prior to intervention. The most common locations were the hand and fingers (62.9%). Ganglion cysts were the most frequent misdiagnosis (25.2%). Among the 154 studies describing diagnostic imaging, only 17 (11.0%) used ultrasound while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; n = 54, 35.1%) was the most commonly used. Surgical excision was the primary treatment, with no reported recurrences. The mean follow-up was 27.3 months. Although MRI remains the gold standard diagnostic tool for upper extremity leiomyomas, ultrasound offers a noninvasive, cost-effective, and accessible alternative. Expanding the use of ultrasound in resource-limited settings may improve early diagnosis, streamline management, and enhance outcomes. Our case demonstrates the usefulness of ultrasound examination for diagnosis and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.