Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41944244›Full record

Observational studyEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2026

Acute Suspected Stroke Clinical Pathway Use in Tasmanian Emergency Departments: A Retrospective Study.

Innocent Tawanda Mudzingwa, Sarah Jane Prior, Phoebe Griffin, Emma Tavender, Viet Tran

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Innocent Tawanda MudzingwaTasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8644-649X
Sarah Jane PriorTasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Burnie, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5782-9141
Phoebe GriffinTasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8208-5818
Emma TavenderEmergency Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Departments of Paediatrics and Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7230-712X
Viet TranTasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8890-1457

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council MRF2018041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStroke is a leading cause of disability and healthcare burden in Australia, affecting over 440,000 people. Timely diagnosis and intervention are essential for improving outcomes, and national ED standards emphasise rapid assessment, imaging and treatment. Clinical pathways aim to standardise care and reduce delays, yet regional disparities persist. This study examined suspected acute stroke pathway use in Tasmanian EDs, assessing guideline adherence, waiting times and inter-hospital variation.

methodsThis retrospective observational study analysed 205 suspected stroke presentations across four public Tasmanian EDs in 2021. Data from digital medical records were evaluated for pathway utilisation, adherence to key clinical elements and time metrics.

resultsThe mean patient age was 70.5 years, with 56% male. Suspected stroke pathway use varied significantly between hospitals (27%-62%). In unadjusted analyses, pathway-managed patients more frequently completed ROSIER and NIHSS assessments (p < 0.0025) and were more likely to receive thrombolysis, though causality cannot be inferred. Pathway use was also associated with shorter times to initial ED assessment (< 10 min) and faster CT imaging (< 45 min) compared with non-pathway care (> 50 and > 130 min) across EDs statewide.

conclusionUse of the suspected acute stroke pathway appeared to vary across the four EDs, suggesting differences in pathway use and integration into everyday clinical workflows. Pathway use was associated with higher adherence to evidence-based guidelines and improved timeliness of care. However, these findings are subject to confounding by other factors and should therefore be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysEmergency Service, HospitalStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTasmaniaTreatment Delayemergency departmentregional EDssuspected stroke pathway

Identifiers

PMID41944244
PMCPMC13054917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.