ArticleJournal of diabetes2026
Association Between Socioeconomic Status and the Prevalence of Metabolic Diseases: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in China.
Article in Journal of diabetes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetabolic diseases remain a fast-growing global health burden. Besides other known factors, socioeconomic status (SES) has been recognized as a key determinant of metabolic health. This study aimed to investigate the association between SES and the prevalence of metabolic diseases in the Chinese population.
methodsWe analyzed data from a nationwide community-based cross-sectional study in China. SES was derived to a composite score (range 0-3) using three indicators (educational attainment, living conditions, and marital status), with higher scores indicating better SES. Chronic diseases were diagnosed through biochemical testing and clinical assessments. Logistic regression models were applied to estimate associations between SES scores and metabolic diseases.
resultsAmong 201 532 participants, the lowest SES group had 87.1% higher odds of metabolic diseases than the highest SES group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.871, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.739, 2.016). One-point decrease in SES score was associated with increased prevalence of hypertension (OR = 1.096, 95% CI: 1.080, 1.113) and obesity (OR = 1.112, 95% CI: 1.091, 1.134). In contrast, lower SES scores were linked to a reduced prevalence of dyslipidemia (OR = 0.931, 95% CI: 0.918, 0.945) and diabetes (OR = 0.974, 95% CI: 0.958, 0.990) after adjusting for covariates. We also observed that lower SES scores showed stronger associations with increased prevalence of obesity and hypertension in women but decreased risks of diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obesity in men.
conclusionsLower SES was associated with a higher prevalence of hypertension and obesity but a lower prevalence of dyslipidemia and diabetes, with significant gender differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.