Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41944029›Full record

ArticleGut and liver2026

Liver Failure versus Organ Failure in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: Sequence and Consequence.

Young Chang, Jae Young Jang, Soung Won Jeong, Do Seon Song, Hee Yeon Kim, Young Kul Jung, Tae Hyung Kim, Hyung Joon Yim, Eileen L Yoon, Ki Tae Suk and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut and liver, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Young ChangInstitute for Digestive Research, Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7752-7618
Jae Young JangInstitute for Digestive Research, Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5335-752X
Soung Won JeongInstitute for Digestive Research, Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2855-6011
Do Seon SongDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8278-4878
Hee Yeon KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3640-5491
Young Kul JungDepartment of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6566-1382
Tae Hyung KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5987-9019
Hyung Joon YimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9370-7977
Eileen L YoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0474-048X
Ki Tae SukDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9623-9272
Jeong-Ju YooDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7802-0381
Sang Gyune KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8694-777X
Moon Young KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5985-8077
Sung-Eun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0114-647X
Jung-Hee KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7274-0989
Jung Gil ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9586-5522
Won KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5294-8368
Dong Joon KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0370-8285
Korean Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (KACLiF) Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is characterized by the acute decompensation of the liver in patients with preexisting chronic liver disease or cirrhosis, often resulting in multiorgan failure and high short-term mortality. This study aimed to investigate the sequence of organ failures, particularly liver and renal failure, and their impact on the short-term survival in ACLF patients. Methods: We analyzed data from 1,765 patients in a prospective Korean ACLF cohort, focusing on the timing of liver and renal failures. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with the log-rank test, and multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Patients with initial liver failure had significantly worse OS compared to those without liver failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.6; p=0.008), and those who developed liver failure during the disease course had an even poorer prognosis (aHR, 5.7; p=0.002). There was no significant difference in OS between patients without renal failure and those with initial renal failure (aHR, 0.8; p=0.508). However, renal failure that developed during hospitalization was associated with a worse prognosis (aHR, 1.9; p=0.056). Patients with initial renal failure had significantly better OS than those with initial liver failure (aHR, 2.4; p=0.040). Conclusions: Organ failure developing during hospitalization is more detrimental than failure present at admission. ACLF with initial renal failure has a better prognosis than ACLF with initial liver failure. ACLF patients with initial renal failure have a 28-day survival rate exceeding 90% if renal failure is present initially; however, this rate significantly decreases if renal failure occurs during hospitalization.

Indexed as

Acute-On-Chronic Liver FailureLiver FailureMultiple Organ FailureRenal InsufficiencyAdultAgedFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRepublic of KoreaAcute-on-chronic liver failureOrgan failureRenal failure

Identifiers

PMID41944029
PMCPMC13575900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.