ArticleWestern journal of nursing research2026
Building Research Capacity to Enroll Spanish-Speaking Patients and Families in a Traumatic Brain Injury Transitional Care Intervention.
Article in Western journal of nursing research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Hispanic or Latino community account for under 8% of US clinical trial samples. Research is needed to facilitate increased enrollment of Hispanic or Latino individuals into trials.
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to describe cultural and linguistic adaptation of the BETTER traumatic brain injury (TBI) transitional care intervention and accompanying participant workbook to be suitable for Spanish-speaking patients with TBI and their families.
methodsBuilding on intervention development with Spanish-speaking patients and families, the cultural adaptation (phase I) included incorporating perspectives from qualitative interviews of interpreters and providers on the overall intervention. Rapid qualitative analysis was employed in phase I, allowing for efficient implementation of cultural adaptation findings in the BETTER clinical trial. Linguistic adaptation (phase II) included workbook translation, cognitive user-testing, and participant feedback.
resultsHealth care providers and interpreters (n = 10, phase I) and one workbook reviewer (phase II) participated. Participants' mean age was 45.5 years, majority were female (n = 8), and all were bilingual. Phase I analysis produced 2 themes: (1) centering culture to advance patient outcomes, and (2) enhancing uptake of BETTER. The main recommendations received in phase II were related to orthographic changes (25%) and limiting use of English idioms (19%), which did not hold meaning in the Spanish language.
conclusionStudy findings supported cultural and linguistic adaptation of BETTER and the accompanying participant workbook. Steps taken in this study can serve as a model for researchers seeking to culturally and linguistically adapt interventions to engage non-English speaking and minoritized participants in research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.