Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41943876›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental microbiology reports2026

The Indoor Microbiome: Sampling, Analysis and Emerging Trends.

Iva Šunić, Jelena Šarac, Dubravka Havaš Auguštin, Sofya Pozdniakova, Robert M W Ferguson, Matijana Jergović, David Visentin, Sílvia Borràs, Elizabeth Archer, Drew K Henderson and 14 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental microbiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Iva ŠunićInstitute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5289-9463
Jelena ŠaracInstitute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb, Croatia.
Dubravka Havaš AuguštinInstitute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb, Croatia.
Sofya PozdniakovaAIRLAB, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain.
Robert M W FergusonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7966-8350
Matijana JergovićAndrija Štampar Teaching Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
David VisentinFaculty of Biotechnology and Drug Development, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Sílvia BorràsAIRLAB, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain.
Elizabeth ArcherSchool of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6760-9406
Drew K HendersonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Sandra VitkoDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Adna AšićResearch Institute Verlab for Biomedical Engineering, Medical Devices and Artificial Intelligence, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Anja BošnjakovićInstitute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb, Croatia.
Željka MaglicaFaculty of Biotechnology and Drug Development, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Carla ViegasH&TRC Health and Technology Research Center, ESTeSL Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Natalija NovokmetInstitute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb, Croatia.
Nina KarlovićInstitute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb, Croatia.
Damir MarjanovićInstitute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb, Croatia.
Adam MuszyńskiFaculty of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8539-236X
Yuxi LiuHuman Microbiome Research (HUMI), Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Piia KarisolaHuman Microbiome Research (HUMI), Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Harri AleniusHuman Microbiome Research (HUMI), Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Lukasz KrychDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Mario LovrićInstitute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3541-9624

Funding

Academy of Medical SciencesAustralian National Health and Medical Research Council APP2008813Australian National Health and Medical Research Council APP2017786European Union's Call on Environment and Health (HORIZON-HLTH-2021-ENVHLTH-02) 101057693European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation programme 101057497European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation programme 101057779Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation 22.00324the European Union 101056883United Kingdom Research and Innovation 10040524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indoor spaces contain diverse microbial communities that shape human health. These microorganisms are particularly relevant to respiratory diseases, including asthma and allergies. Despite growing recognition of the importance of indoor microbial exposures, research in this field is slowed by differences in methods. These inconsistencies make it difficult to compare results and draw conclusions. This systematic review analyses 106 studies published between 2000 and 2025 that investigated indoor microbiomes in dust, air, and other matrices across homes, schools, and other built environments. We assessed sampling strategies, DNA extraction protocols, sequencing technologies, and bioinformatic pipelines, identifying trends, inconsistencies, and areas requiring harmonisation. Passive sampling, particularly dust collection, was the most common approach, while Illumina-based 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing dominated molecular analyses. However, variations in targeted gene regions, extraction kits, and analytical tools limited cross-study comparability. Ecological findings revealed consistent detection of bacterial taxa such as Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Corynebacterium, and fungal taxa including Cladosporium, Aspergillus, and Penicillium, with diversity shaped by building characteristics, ventilation, humidity, occupancy, and presence of pets. This review highlights the need for standardised protocols in indoor microbiome research to facilitate reproducibility, enable meta-analyses, and inform health-related guidelines for indoor environments.

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyAir Pollution, IndoorBacteriaMicrobiotaDustEnvironmental MonitoringFungiHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDustRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sdust microbiomeindoor air qualitymethodological harmonisationsampling methodssequencing methods

Identifiers

PMID41943876
PMCPMC13054241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.