Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41943826›Full record

SynthesisPeerJ2026

Birthing balls and peanut balls for labor pain, delivery duration, and mode of delivery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Qiuhong Luo, Xiao Feng, Meng Zhang, Yan Wu, Linyan Wu, Mingying Tan

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qiuhong LuoOutpatient Department, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiao FengOutpatient Department, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Meng ZhangOutpatient Department, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yan WuOutpatient Department, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Linyan WuOutpatient Department, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Mingying TanOutpatient Department, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To determine the effects of birthing balls and peanut balls on labor pain, duration of labor, and mode of delivery. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE ( Results: A total of 23 studies involving 3,192 participants were included. Relative to no birthing balls, birthing balls significantly alleviated labor pain (MD: -1.81; 95% CI [-2.38 to -1.23]), shortened the duration of the first (SMD: -0.86; -1.26 to -0.45) and second (MD: -17.00 min; -26.54 to -7.46) stages of labor, and reduced the incidence of cesarean delivery (RR: 0.51; 0.37 to 0.71). Peanut balls significantly shortened the duration of the first (SMD: -0.85; -1.25 to -0.46) and second (MD: -10.90 min; -21.11 to -0.70) stages of labor, compared to no peanut balls. No other significant results were observed. Some concerns were raised and the overall quality ranged from moderate to low. Conclusions: Based on low- to moderate-quality evidence, birthing balls appear to be a potentially effective tool and may be considered by nurses and midwives to help alleviate labor pain and shorten the duration of the first and second stages of labor, thereby potentially reducing the likelihood of cesarean delivery. Low-quality evidence suggests that peanut balls could help shorten the duration of the first and second stages of labor. More well-designed studies are needed to verify the true and comparative effects of birthing and peanut balls.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricLabor PainFemaleHumansPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsBirthing ballDeliveryLaborNatural childbirthPeanut ball

Identifiers

PMID41943826
PMCPMC13050517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.