ArticleClean technologies and environmental policy2026
Early-stage environmental impact forecasting of chemicals and processes with machine learning and data analytics tools.
Article in Clean technologies and environmental policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early-stage environmental evaluation of chemicals and process technologies is often constrained by the lack of detailed life cycle inventory (LCI) data and limited access to commercial life cycle assessment (LCA) tools. This work presents a predictive framework for estimating the environmental impacts of chemicals and processes during the early design stages when such information is unavailable. The framework combines Machine Learning (ML) models, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), trained on molecular descriptors and thermodynamic properties to predict four cradle-to-gate (production phase) endpoint metrics: Human Health Impact (HHI), Ecosystem Quality Impact (EQI), Global Warming Potential (GWP), and Resource Utilization Impact (RUI). To extend the analysis to the gate-to-gate (use phase) and gate-to-grave (end-of-life) phases, a power law regression model was developed to estimate the GWP scaling exponents for technologies as a function of the capacity/processing rate and energy consumption. Feature importance analysis using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) indicates that both molecular and thermodynamic descriptors contribute significantly to the prediction of environmental impacts. Two case studies were selected to demonstrate and validate the applicability of this framework. Overall, the results demonstrate the combined approach provides a practical tool for early-stage environmental screening of chemicals and processes. Graphical abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10098-026-03479-8.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.