ReviewJAMIA open2026
Pragmatic approaches for studying workflow in health informatics.
Review in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop recommendations to inform the development and use of pragmatic workflow approaches. Problem Description: Workflow analysis in research is rigorous but also resource-intensive, requiring extensive expertise, labor, and time. However, workflow analysis is needed in clinics during technology implementation or evaluation over time in which such labor and time are not necessarily readily available. Pragmatic workflow approaches are required to enable individuals and organizations to conduct workflow analysis as needed in a timely and efficient way. Results: We adapted five principles to guide pragmatic workflow studies: relevance, actionability, comprehensibility, ethical reasoning, and iterative assessment. We also detailed a six-step guideline. Discussion and Conclusion: Pragmatic workflow approaches use fewer resources by appropriately trading off rigor to create empirically relevant workflow analysis and recommendations. However, managing this trade-off can be challenging. We can learn from case studies that apply these approaches to determine strategies for future modifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.