Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41943778›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

MRI Findings of Ovarian Carcinosarcoma: A Retrospective Comparison With Endometrioid Carcinoma.

Akane Tashiro, Tomohisa Okuma, Taiki Yamaguchi, Takashi Honjo, Nahoko Inoue, Suzuka Okajima, Makoto Murakami, Tomoyuki Ichimura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Akane TashiroRadiodiagnosis, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, JPN.
Tomohisa OkumaRadiodiagnosis, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, JPN.
Taiki YamaguchiRadiodiagnosis, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, JPN.
Takashi HonjoRadiodiagnosis, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, JPN.
Nahoko InoueRadiodiagnosis, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, JPN.
Suzuka OkajimaObstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, JPN.
Makoto MurakamiGynecology, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, JPN.
Tomoyuki IchimuraGynecology, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Ovarian carcinosarcoma is a rare and highly aggressive ovarian malignancy composed of epithelial and mesenchymal components, and its preoperative diagnosis remains challenging because of nonspecific imaging features. This study aimed to identify MRI findings useful for differentiating ovarian carcinosarcoma from ovarian endometrioid carcinoma by comparing their imaging characteristics. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent pelvic MRI between January 2002 and December 2025 for suspected malignant ovarian tumors and were subsequently diagnosed with ovarian carcinosarcoma or ovarian endometrioid carcinoma on postoperative histopathology. Patient age and MRI findings were analyzed. Evaluated MRI features included tumor size, laterality, morphology, margin characteristics, tumor architecture, signal heterogeneity on T2-weighted images, morphology of solid components, presence of a stained-glass appearance, mille-feuille-like layered pattern, hemorrhage, enhancement characteristics, necrosis, lymphadenopathy, ascites, and peritoneal dissemination. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of solid tumor components were measured. Imaging findings were compared between groups using Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Results Among 12 cases of ovarian carcinosarcoma, the maximum tumor diameter ranged from 5.7 to 21.5 cm (mean, 11.6 ± 4.8 cm). Tumors were unilateral in 11 cases. An irregular tumor margin was observed in 6 cases, solid-dominant components in 7 cases, nodular solid components in 12 cases, the presence of a mille-feuille sign in 2 cases, lymphadenopathy in 6 cases, peritoneal dissemination in 8 cases, and ascites in 9 cases. The mean ADC value of the solid component in ovarian carcinosarcoma was 0.952 ± 0.186 × 10⁻³ mm²/s. Significant differences between ovarian carcinosarcoma and ovarian endometrioid carcinoma were observed for patient age (67.6 years vs. 56.9 years, p=0.003), margin irregularity (6/12:50% vs. 3/45:6.7%, p=0.002), predominance of solid components (7/12:58.3% vs. 11/45:24.4%, p=0.037), nodular morphology of solid portions (12/12:100% vs. 25/45:55.6%, p=0.005), presence of the mille-feuille sign (2/12:16.7% vs. 0/45:0%, p=0.041), and peritoneal dissemination (8/12:66.7% vs. 9/45:20%, p=0.004). Laterality, overall tumor shape, the presence of hemorrhagic components, and mean ADC value did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion On MRI, ovarian carcinosarcoma tends to present as a mass with irregular margins, predominantly nodular solid components with partial cystic components, and frequent peritoneal dissemination. Recognition of these characteristic findings may help differentiate ovarian carcinosarcoma from ovarian endometrioid carcinoma and improve preoperative diagnostic accuracy in patients with malignant ovarian tumors.

Indexed as

cancermagnetic resonance imagingmalignant mixed epithelial and mesenchymal tumorovarian carcinosarcomaovarian endometrioid carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41943778
PMCPMC13050572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.