Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41943776›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Decision-Making for Space Maintenance After the Premature Loss of Primary First Molars: A Clinically Oriented Narrative Review.

Gopal Babu, Sindhuja Arunachalam, Garima Jindal, Ankitu Sahai, Ritambhra Dikshit, Shahina Khanam, Tanya Pandey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gopal BabuPediatric Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Sindhuja ArunachalamPediatric Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Garima JindalPediatric Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Ankitu SahaiPediatric Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Ritambhra DikshitPediatric Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Shahina KhanamPediatric Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Tanya PandeyPediatric Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this narrative review is to critically integrate the available evidence on space changes following the premature loss of primary first molars and to develop a clinically orientated, evidence-based decision-making framework for space maintenance. A clinically focused narrative review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Studies that met the eligibility criteria and were published in the English language between January 1998 and December 2025 were included. Fourteen primary studies and six systematic reviews were selected based on PECO (population, exposure, control, and outcome) criteria. Evidence was synthesized narratively, rather than through a quantitative meta-analysis, due to substantial heterogeneity. Eruption and stable intercuspation of the first permanent molar, as well as a leptoprosopic facial growth pattern, consistently emerged as independent predictors of clinically relevant space loss. In contrast, archetype, molar relationship, time elapsed since extraction, and crowding functioned primarily as modifying factors. Clinical decision-making should be individualized using a structured, risk-based framework that integrates biological and occlusal determinants rather than relying solely on tooth loss.

Indexed as

decision-makingpremature lossprimary first molarspace maintenancespace management

Identifiers

PMID41943776
PMCPMC13050492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.