ArticleCureus2026
Titanium Allergy: A Case of Foreign Body Reaction Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Titanium is widely regarded as a biocompatible and inert material commonly used in surgical implants. Despite this reputation, hypersensitivity reactions to titanium, though rare, can lead to persistent and unexplained postoperative symptoms. We report the case of a 76-year-old woman who developed progressive right upper quadrant abdominal pain, burning sensations, neuropathic symptoms, and fatigue three months after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in which titanium clips were used. Her history included documented systemic intolerance to a titanium dental implant 10 years earlier, which had required removal. Extensive laboratory and imaging evaluation was unremarkable. Titanium hypersensitivity was clinically suspected based on the temporal association between clip placement and symptom onset, along with systematic exclusion of alternative causes. MELISA® (memory lymphocyte immunostimulation assay) testing was discussed, but declined due to cost and extended turnaround time. Following diagnostic laparoscopy and removal of the four titanium clips approximately three months after symptom onset, the patient experienced complete symptom resolution within one week. She remains asymptomatic at six-month follow-up. This case highlights the importance of considering metal hypersensitivity in patients with unexplained postoperative symptoms and prior exposure to implants. Increased awareness and selective preoperative screening, particularly evaluation for prior metal intolerance, may help prevent unnecessary morbidity and repeated interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.