ArticleCureus2026
Profile of Unidentified Dead Bodies in Northern India: A Tertiary Care Center Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIdentification is the primary step in any medicolegal investigation. Unidentified bodies pose significant challenges for forensic experts and investigating officers due to the lack of history and frequent decomposition. Establishing identity is crucial for legal resolution and providing closure to families.
aimThe aim of this study is to profile unidentified dead bodies to observe the overall patterns and characteristics of such cases in Uttarakhand.
methodsA retrospective, record-based analysis was conducted at the Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India. The study reviewed 633 autopsies of unidentified or unclaimed bodies performed over a six-and-a-half-year period (from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2025). Data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Statistics for Windows, version 23.0 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).
resultsUnidentified bodies accounted for 15.3% (633 out of 4,132) of all autopsies. The majority were male bodies in the 21-60 year age group. Regarding clinical status, 56.24% were brought dead, and 56.39% had no history of hospital admission, while 42.65% were brought alive and 42.81% received hospital care before death. Frequent histories included natural diseases, recovery from water, or being found dead in public spaces. Approximately half of the bodies were decomposed at the time of autopsy. The leading causes of death were drowning, sepsis, bronchopneumonia, traumatic brain injury, and coronary artery disease. While forensic samples were preserved in all cases, advanced decomposition often limited definitive identification.
conclusionTo ensure dignity and closure for families, the government should strengthen identification protocols. This requires better coordination between investigative agencies and forensic experts, along with the effective use of advanced forensic resources to reduce the number of unresolved cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.