Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41943646›Full record

ReviewClinical endoscopy2026

Next step after endoscopic resection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: metastatic risk assessment and management of non-curative resection cases.

Ryu Ishihara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ryu IshiharaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic resection (ER) is an established treatment for early stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the management of non-curative resections remains a clinical challenge. This review aimed to evaluate the next steps for patients with non-curative resections based on the existing literature. Relevant studies on ER outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, including recurrence rates, metastatic risks, and treatment strategies, were reviewed. The analysis focused on pathological findings, including tumor invasion depth and lymphovascular involvement (LVI). Comparative data on surgical resection and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as adjuvant treatments were analyzed. Patients with pathological epithelial or lamina propria mucosa LVI-negative tumors showed low recurrence and metastasis rates (0.4%-5.6%). In contrast, those with submucosal or positive LVI cancer demonstrated a higher risk (10%-30%). Adjuvant treatment with surgery or CRT significantly reduced recurrence; however, the risk of complications must be considered. CRT showed favorable outcomes in low metastatic-risk cases, whereas surgery was preferred in high-risk patients. Active surveillance may be appropriate in certain low-risk patients with a poor overall health status. The management of non-curative ER cases requires individualized decision-making based on pathological risk factors. Further research is needed to refine the risk assessment and potentially utilize circulating tumor DNA testing to enhance precision.

Indexed as

Endoscopic submucosal dissectionEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaNeoplasm metastasisNon-curativeRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID41943646
PMCPMC13054483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.