Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41943643›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology journal2026

Clinically validated deep learning auto-contouring for glioblastoma volumetric modulated arc therapy planning: a dosimetric equivalence study.

Omar Hamzaoui, Yassine Oulhouq, Mohammed Rezzoug, Mustapha Zerfaoui, Dikra Bakkari, Abdeslem Rrhioua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Omar HamzaouiLaboratory of Theoretical Physics, Particles, Modeling, and Energies, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Oujda, Morocco.
Yassine OulhouqLaboratory of Theoretical Physics, Particles, Modeling, and Energies, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Oujda, Morocco.
Mohammed RezzougLaboratory of Theoretical Physics, Particles, Modeling, and Energies, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Oujda, Morocco.
Mustapha ZerfaouiLaboratory of Theoretical Physics, Particles, Modeling, and Energies, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Oujda, Morocco.
Dikra BakkariNational School of Applied Sciences, Mohammed First University, Oujda, Morocco.
Abdeslem RrhiouaLaboratory of Theoretical Physics, Particles, Modeling, and Energies, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Oujda, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeManual delineation of target volumes and organs-at-risk (OARs) for glioblastoma radiotherapy is a critical bottleneck prone to inter-observer variability. This study developed a fully automated, dual-modality deep learning framework to validate its clinical utility by demonstrating the dosimetric equivalence of generated contours against an expert standard. MATERIALS AND

methodsA deep learning framework was developed using a retrospective dataset of 100 patients. It integrates two specialized networks operating without pre-alignment: a specialized dual-encoder attention U-Net for computed tomography (CT) (used for OARs delineation and dose calculation), and a single-encoder attention U-Net for T2-FLAIR magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (used for precise target volumes definition). A modality dispatcher routes images to the appropriate model. Geometric performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). For clinical validation, automated CT contours were used to generate volumetric modulated arc therapy plans. These plans were compared to those based on expert manual contours via paired statistical analysis.

resultsThe framework demonstrated excellent geometric accuracy on the independent test set. Mean planning target volume (PTV) DSC was 0.94 ± 0.03 on MRI and 0.92 ± 0.04 on CT. Dosimetric analysis confirmed clinical viability. No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between automated and manual plans for PTV coverage (D₉₅%), OAR maximum doses, or any evaluated metric.

conclusionThe automated framework provides accurate segmentation on both CT and MRI. Demonstrated dosimetric equivalence validates clinical reliability and potential to enhance planning efficiency while reducing inter-observer variability.

Indexed as

Computer-assistedDeep learningDosimetryGlioblastomaImage segmentationMultimodal imagingRadiotherapy planning

Identifiers

PMID41943643
PMCPMC13054532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.