ArticleRadiation oncology journal2026
Prognostication of non-small cell lung cancer with concurrent chemoradiation treatment using neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.
Article in Radiation oncology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic factor in patients with stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). Furthermore, we examined neutrophil and lymphocyte changes to determine their contributions to NLR variation over time. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective review was performed that included 262 patients diagnosed with stage III unresectable NSCLC from 2005 to 2020 who received concurrent CRT with a 60 Gy or 66 Gy in 30 fractions radiotherapy regimen. Pre-CRT NLR, lymphocyte nadir NLR, post-CRT NLR at 1 month ± 2-week intervals up to 6 months relative to the end of CRT, and NLR fold-change were calculated. The primary endpoint was overall survival.
resultsOf the examined parameters, high NLR had the most consistently high prognostic value for poorer outcomes for all 3 endpoints in the 6-month period post-CRT, with the highest hazard ratios (HRs) at 3 to 4 months. This was associated with a decrease in neutrophils from 3 to 4 months, while NLR and lymphocytes were relatively stable. Several other parameters at 4 months, including individual cell counts and NLR fold-change (relative to the lymphocyte nadir), were associated with high HRs for mortality.
conclusionOur study suggests that a window of time at 3 to 4 months post-CRT exists for when NLR and related hematologic parameters demonstrate increased prognostic value. This period may represent an area for further investigation as a potential opportunity for risk stratification with possible implications for surveillance and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.