Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41943506›Full record

Observational studyJournal of internal medicine2026

Flare risk after oral glucocorticoid bridging with methotrexate or intra-articular bridging with triple therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Kristina Lend, Jos W R Twisk, Frieda A Koopman, Anna Rudin, Merete Lund Hetland, Till Uhlig, Dan C Nordström, Michael T Nurmohamed, Bjorn Gudbjornsson, Kim Hørslev-Petersen and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01491815 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Blinded-assessor, Phase 4 Study in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis to Compare Active Conventional Therapy Versus Three Biologic Treatments, and Two De-escalation Strategies in Patients Who Respond to Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01491815 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Blinded-assessor, Phase 4 Study in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis to Compare Active Conventional Therapy Versus Three Biologic Treatments, and Two De-escalation Strategies in Patients Who Respond to Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2012 to 2023Enrolled812ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsNon-biological DMARD's, Cimzia, Orencia, RoActemra
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Kristina LendDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Molecular Medicine (CMM), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5037-5546
Jos W R TwiskDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Frieda A KoopmanDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anna RudinDepartment of Rheumatology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Merete Lund HetlandDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Till UhligCenter for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6881-9552
Dan C NordströmDepartments of Medicine and Rheumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Michael T NurmohamedDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bjorn GudbjornssonCentre for Rheumatology Research, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Kim Hørslev-PetersenDanish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark.
Marte Schrumpf HeibergCenter for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Tuulikki Sokka-IslerFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Gerdur GrondalCentre for Rheumatology Research, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Espen A HaavardsholmCenter for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Mikkel ØstergaardDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jon LampaDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Molecular Medicine (CMM), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ronald van VollenhovenDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Molecular Medicine (CMM), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Academy of Finland 258536Bristol Myers SquibbFinska LäkaresällskapetHelsinki University Central Hospital 1159005Icelandic Society for RheumatologyInter-regional grant from all health regions in NorwayNordForsk 70945Regionernes Medicinpulje 14/217Research Fund of University Hospital A2015017South-Eastern Health RegionStockholm County Council 20100490Swedish Medical Research Council 2015-00891_5Swedish Medical Research Council C0634901Swedish Medical Research Council D0342301Swedish Rheumatism AssociationUCB
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate, in early rheumatoid arthritis, whether bridging with glucocorticoids (GCs) is associated with an increased risk of flare following GC tapering and withdrawal.

methodsA total of 810 NOrdic Rheumatic Diseases Strategy Trials And Registries (NORD-STAR) patients were included in this post hoc analysis: all received methotrexate (MTX), in addition to which 135 patients received oral GC bridging therapy ('oral GC group'); 80 received intra-articular (IA) GC bridging therapy, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine ('injection GC group'); and 595 received one of three (certolizumab pegol, abatacept and tocilizumab) biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), hereafter the ('bDMARD group'). Clinical disease activity index (CDAI) flares (≥4.5 increase in CDAI score) were assessed longitudinally.

resultsUp to 48 weeks, flare occurred at least once in 43% of oral GC, 24% of injection GC and 28% of bDMARD patients. Over-time relative risk (RR) was higher with oral GC bridging (adjusted RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.16-2.03) but similar with injection GC bridging (adjusted RR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.54-1.55) versus bDMARD. Flare rates were numerically higher in the oral GC versus bDMARD group at all time points (12, 24, 32, 40 and 48 weeks), with a significant difference at w.40, the visit after protocol-defined GC discontinuation; at this visit 27% of patients who discontinued GC experienced flare; 29% among those in remission; 33% remained on low-dose prednisolone at 48 weeks.

conclusionDiscontinuation of oral GC bridging therapy on background MTX is associated with increased flare risk, even among patients in remission. Flare rates with IA GC bridging plus triple therapy did not differ from the bDMARD group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2011-004720-35; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01491815.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidGlucocorticoidsMethotrexateAdministration, OralAdultAgedBridge TherapyClinical Trials, Phase IV as TopicDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHydroxychloroquineInjections, Intra-ArticularMaleMiddle AgedAntirheumatic AgentsGlucocorticoidsHydroxychloroquineMethotrexateSulfasalazineflareintra‐articular glucocorticoid injectionsoral glucocorticoidsrheumatoid arthritistapering and discontinuation

Identifiers

PMID41943506
PMCPMC13137394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.