Trial reportPhysiological reports2026
Association between cardiac autonomic control and blood pressure response to resistance training in adults with pharmacologically treated hypertension.
Trial report in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the acute cardiac autonomic responses to high and low intensity resistance training and their association with post exercise hypotension in adults with pharmacologically treated hypertension. This randomized clinical trial included 31 participants with pharmacologically treated hypertension. The effects of two resistance training sessions performed at high intensity (80% of 1RM) and low intensity (40% of 1RM), matched for total training volume, were compared. Blood pressure and heart rate variability were measured before and after exercise. Significance level was set at 5%. No significant interaction was observed for any of the variables (p > 0.05). Both intensities produced significant reductions in blood pressure and in cardiac parasympathetic indices. During the high intensity session, ΔV1% heart rate variability index was positively correlated with blood pressure reductions. During the low intensity session, low frequency was negatively correlated with blood pressure. In conclusion, both high and low intensity RT elicited acute hypotensive effects, with a more pronounced cardiac autonomic response characterized by greater vagal withdrawal observed for the low intensity training protocol. Furthermore, changes in indices related to cardiac sympathetic modulation and greater decreases in cardiac parasympathetic modulation were associated with a greater post exercise hypotensive response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.