Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41943243›Full record

ArticleAutism : the international journal of research and practice2026

Associations Between Autism and Self-Reported Dimensions of Interoception.

Kiera Louise Adams, Caroline Catmur, Geoffrey Bird

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kiera Louise AdamsUniversity of Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5471-6501
Caroline CatmurKing's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6996-4295
Geoffrey BirdUniversity of Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2310-0202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a wealth of research on autism and interoception, there is not a clear consensus about which dimensions of interoception (if any) are related to autism. This study explored whether self-reported interoceptive accuracy, attention and evaluation are related to autism diagnosis and autistic traits. We analysed questionnaire responses from 519 participants, including 232 autistic participants. We found that people with an autism diagnosis had more negative interpretations of their bodily signals than people without an autism diagnosis, and increasing autistic traits in a general population sample were associated with higher interoceptive attention, lower interoceptive accuracy and higher negative interoceptive evaluation. Our findings suggest that interoceptive evaluation should be a priority for future research.Lay AbstractAutism is thought to be linked to differences in the way people notice, process and understand signals coming from inside of their bodies. This study explored how both autistic traits and autism diagnoses are associated with the processing of bodily signals. We found that among 519 participants, having more autistic traits meant that people paid more attention to body signals, reported lower accuracy at detecting them and had more negative interpretations of those signals. Autism diagnoses were associated with more negative interpretations of bodily signals.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderInteroceptionAdolescentAdultAttentionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultinteroceptioninteroceptive accuracyinteroceptive attentioninteroceptive evaluationmental health

Identifiers

PMID41943243
PMCPMC13187214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.