Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41943198›Full record

ReviewJournal of environmental quality

Bridging single-species research and mixture reality: Emerging contaminants fate and transport in vadose zones.

Aaron Lee M Daigh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aaron Lee M DaighDepartment of Agronomy & Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5661-4800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vadose zones serve as interfaces controlling contaminant transport from the land surface to underlying aquifers. While traditional research has largely focused on individual contaminant species, real-world contamination often involves complex mixtures containing dozens to thousands of chemical species. This disconnect creates considerable challenges for predicting contaminant behavior, assessing environmental risks, and developing effective remediation strategies. This review examines complex contaminant mixtures in vadose zones, with emphasis on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, pharmaceuticals and personal care products, and hydraulic fracturing fluid additives and contaminants. We synthesize recent advances in understanding mixture behavior, including competitive sorption at air-water interfaces and solid surfaces, co-facilitated transport mechanisms, and transformation dynamics under co-contaminant conditions. Field observations from contaminated sites reveal that mixture effects alter transport rates, retention capacities, and degradation pathways relative to single-species predictions. While vadose zones function as persistent secondary sources, transient saturation conditions can enhance contaminant transport by an order of magnitude relative to constant-flow predictions. Current modeling frameworks remain limited in their capability to account for complex physicochemical interactions in contaminant mixtures, particularly under transient flow and heterogeneous environments. We identify and describe six priority areas for new or enhanced research to bridge current knowledge gaps: mixture sorption and competitive transport, transformation products and reaction pathways, field-scale validation studies, multi-mechanism remediation technologies, integrated mixture toxicity assessment, and climate change and evolving land use impacts.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringGroundwaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID41943198
PMCPMC13053623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.