Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41943182›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2026

'The GP's offices are far away and the gain would be great.'-A qualitative study on nursing home staff's perspectives on digital solutions for communication issues with general practitioners.

Kathleen Denny, Jana Gundlack, Jonathan Bay, Eric Kroeber, Susanne Unverzagt, Alexander Bauer, Thomas Frese, Amand Führer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kathleen DennyInstitute of General Practice & Family Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-5821-2107
Jana GundlackInstitute of General Practice & Family Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-6986-5834
Jonathan BayInstitute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Interdisciplinary Center of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Eric KroeberInstitute of General Practice & Family Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7201-6023
Susanne UnverzagtInstitute of General Practice & Family Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0108-0415
Alexander BauerInstitute of General Practice & Family Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5262-4315
Thomas FreseInstitute of General Practice & Family Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Amand FührerInstitute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Interdisciplinary Center of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8637-5692

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn aging society and a growing shortage of healthcare professionals pose increasing challenges for nursing homes in Germany. Enhanced collaboration between nursing home staff and General Practitioners is essential to ensure quality care. Understanding nurses' perspectives is crucial to identifying current issues and suitable solutions.

aimTo explore nursing home staff's perspectives on communication and current channels with General Practitioners and evaluate specifically their attitudes towards digital communication options.

methodsThis qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with 13 nursing home employees from seven German nursing homes, conducted between January 2020 and April 2022. Data were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Reporting adhered to COREQ guidelines. We used paradox theory from management studies to interpret communication tensions and solution strategies.

resultsWe identified three key themes: (1) Interprofessional communication problems between nurses and general practitioners, including limited direct contact, technical barriers, and time-related inefficiencies; (2) Perceived ability of digital options to reduce communication problems; and (3) Suggestions to improve communication, with a focus on digital options. Participants expressed a strong openness to digital communication tools, highlighting their potential to alleviate current tensions. Digital tools were viewed as opportunities to streamline communication, enhance efficiency, and ultimately improve collaboration and patient care.

conclusionsThis study provides insights into tensions in healthcare collaboration in nursing homes and possible solution strategies. Participants see digital tools as promising pathways to resolve current inefficiencies and support better interprofessional collaboration. These insights are essential for guiding the development of practical, sustainable solutions to improve care delivery in nursing homes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationGeneral PractitionersInterprofessional RelationsNursing HomesAdultDigital HealthDigital MediaFemaleGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchdigital optionsgeneral practitionersinterprofessional collaborationNursing homesparadox theory

Identifiers

PMID41943182
PMCPMC13055025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.