Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41943169›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Revision and validation of the screen addiction scale in the Chinese cultural context.

Tingting Qiao, Pengzhen Zhou, Xiaodong Wang, Mingmin Wang, Lei Wang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tingting Qiao *Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China. tgzy_s@163.com.
Pengzhen Zhou *Hohhot No.39 Middle School, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Xiaodong WangThe Second Affifiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Inner Mongolia, China.
Mingmin WangInner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Lei WangInner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, screen devices have become an integral part of middle school students' daily learning and lives, yet the concomitant issue of screen addiction cannot be overlooked. This study aimed to revise and validate the 21-item Gökçe Screen Addiction Scale within the Chinese cultural context. In Study 1 (N = 461), the original scale was adapted into Chinese via forward–backward translation by bilingual experts, followed by pilot testing. This culturally adapted version then underwent preliminary revision. Through item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, one item from the original scale was deleted, and the dimensional structure was adjusted to better align with the screen usage patterns of Chinese adolescents, resulting in a 20-item scale comprising four dimensions. In Study 2 (N = 484), the reliability and validity of the preliminarily revised scale were examined. The results of confirmatory factor analysis supported the four-factor structure, demonstrating good construct validity. In Study 3 (N = 491), criterion-related validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, incremental validity, and test–retest reliability were further examined, indicating that the revised scale performed well on all reliability and validity indicators. The final version of the Screen Addiction Scale revised for the Chinese cultural context consists of 20 items across four dimensions: Withdrawal, Mood Regulation, Lying about Use, and Negative Consequences -Compulsive Use. The scale demonstrates good reliability and validity and is suitable for assessing screen addiction levels among Chinese adolescents, thus facilitating targeted interventions for mood regulation and withdrawal in school-based programs.

Indexed as

Internet Addiction DisorderPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAdolescentChinaEast Asian PeopleFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsChinese cultural contextReliability and validityScale revision and validationScreen addiction

Identifiers

PMID41943169
PMCPMC13188465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.