ArticleBMC psychology2026
Revision and validation of the screen addiction scale in the Chinese cultural context.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, screen devices have become an integral part of middle school students' daily learning and lives, yet the concomitant issue of screen addiction cannot be overlooked. This study aimed to revise and validate the 21-item Gökçe Screen Addiction Scale within the Chinese cultural context. In Study 1 (N = 461), the original scale was adapted into Chinese via forward–backward translation by bilingual experts, followed by pilot testing. This culturally adapted version then underwent preliminary revision. Through item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, one item from the original scale was deleted, and the dimensional structure was adjusted to better align with the screen usage patterns of Chinese adolescents, resulting in a 20-item scale comprising four dimensions. In Study 2 (N = 484), the reliability and validity of the preliminarily revised scale were examined. The results of confirmatory factor analysis supported the four-factor structure, demonstrating good construct validity. In Study 3 (N = 491), criterion-related validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, incremental validity, and test–retest reliability were further examined, indicating that the revised scale performed well on all reliability and validity indicators. The final version of the Screen Addiction Scale revised for the Chinese cultural context consists of 20 items across four dimensions: Withdrawal, Mood Regulation, Lying about Use, and Negative Consequences -Compulsive Use. The scale demonstrates good reliability and validity and is suitable for assessing screen addiction levels among Chinese adolescents, thus facilitating targeted interventions for mood regulation and withdrawal in school-based programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.