Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41943145›Full record

Observational studyIsrael journal of health policy research2026

Privatization of ophthalmology: unveiling disparities in the surgical arena.

Asaf Israeli, Keren Hod, Rachel Shemesh, Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe, Eedy Mezer

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Israel journal of health policy research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Asaf IsraeliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vanderbilt Eye Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. asaf.israeli@vumc.org.
Keren HodDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Rachel ShemeshFaculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tamara Wygnanski-JaffeFaculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eedy MezerBruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze the characteristics and trends of ophthalmic surgeries in public and private hospitals, as well as sex-disparities.

methodsA nationwide multicenter retrospective observational trend study encompassing surgeries in 9 different hospitals from 2017 to 2022. The retrieved data, which produced an anonymized database, was further divided into sub-specialties, before implementing descriptive and trend analyses.

resultsA total of 97,325 surgeries were analyzed. Private hospitals had a higher female predominance (p < 0.001). A slight non-significant increase was noted in private hospitals over the years (0.9% annual increase, p = 0.07). Cataract and oculoplastic surgeries were the most common procedures in both domains. In private hospitals, male predominance was noted in cataract, glaucoma, corneal, retinal, and strabismus surgeries, whereas female predominance was noted in oculoplastic surgeries (p < 0.001 for each). In public hospitals, however, male predominance was only observed in glaucoma, corneal, and retinal surgeries, and female predominance was observed in cataract surgeries (p < 0.001 for each).

conclusionPrivatization seems to be an increasing trend in ophthalmology as well, and cream skimming is not as prevalent in this cohort. Sex differences were evident in both the public and private domains in different sub-types of eye surgery.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresOphthalmologyPrivatizationFemaleHospitals, PrivateHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesDisparitiesPrivatePublicSexSurgeriesTrends

Identifiers

PMID41943145
PMCPMC13054969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.