ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2026
Implementation of low-dose buprenorphine induction at a syringe services program.
Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFentanyl's penetration into the unregulated drug supply has complicated the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD), particularly by increasing the risk of buprenorphine-precipitated opioid withdrawal (BPOW). Buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist, remains a first-line treatment for OUD, but traditional induction methods can be intolerable for people using fentanyl. Low-dose induction (LDI), a strategy characterized by gradual buprenorphine titration without prior withdrawal, has emerged as a promising alternative to mitigate BPOW. However, the feasibility and acceptability of LDI in low-barrier, real-world settings such as syringe services programs (SSPs) remain underexplored.
methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods prospective cohort study from June 2023-2024 at an SSP in Miami, Florida, offering a 4-day LDI protocol to patients with OUD who were interested in starting buprenorphine. Follow-up, conducted on a walk-in basis within four weeks, included urine drug screens (UDS), symptom surveys and semi-structured qualitative interviews. The primary outcome was successful buprenorphine initiation, defined by a positive UDS for buprenorphine at follow-up.
resultsOf the 30 participants enrolled in the 4-day LDI protocol, most (n = 29) had prior buprenorphine experience and nearly 90% (n = 26) reported past BPOW. Only 16 (53%) returned for follow-up. Nine (56%) of those followed up tested positive for buprenorphine, 11 (68.8%) reported that LDI worked for them, and 12 (75%) said they would use the method again. Qualitative interviews revealed six key themes: (1) LDI mitigates withdrawal symptoms; (2) instructions were helpful but could be improved; (3) fear of BPOW motivated LDI use; (4) LDI enabled autonomy in recovery; (5) unstable living environments hindered adherence; and (6) LDI allowed participants to maintain social roles.
conclusionsWhile only 30% of the cohort had objective evidence of buprenorphine induction, most reported successful attempts and found LDI acceptable and empowering. High loss to follow-up and environmental instability limited our conclusions in this outpatient harm reduction setting. Further research is needed to refine LDI protocols and address the structural determinants affecting treatment success among people who use fentanyl.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.