Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41943125›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

In the effect of the game taboo

Tuba Korkmaz Aslan, Rukiye Burucu, Hilal Türkben Polat

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05756218 (The Effect of Taboo Game Adapted for Nursing Diagnoses in Professional Practice Lesson on Motivation and Perception of Nursing Diagnoses in Nursing Students), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05756218 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Effect of Taboo Game Adapted for Nursing Diagnoses in Professional Practice Lesson on Motivation and Perception of Nursing Diagnoses in Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNecmettin Erbakan UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsNursing Diagnosis, Taboo Game, MotivationArmsnursing diagnoses - taboo game
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tuba Korkmaz AslanSeydişehir Kamil Akkanat Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Türkiye. tkorkmazaslan@erbakan.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0419-2217
Rukiye BurucuSeydişehir Kamil Akkanat Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9284-5486
Hilal Türkben PolatSeydişehir Kamil Akkanat Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4848-0993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe nursing process is a systematic and scientific problem solving method in determining the care needs of individuals and providing individualized care. This study was conducted to determine the effect of Taboo game on nursing students' motivation and perception of nursing diagnoses.

methodsThis is a cluster-randomized controlled trial employing a parallel-group, pretest-posttest design. The total number of participants is 80. Data were collected with Sociodemographic Information Form, Instructional Materials Motivation Survey and Perception of Nursing Diagnoses Survey. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ID: NCT05756218, date of the registration: January, 2023. FINDING: The taboo game prepared for nursing diagnoses did not have a positive effect on students' learning motivation, but it had a positive effect on their attitudes towards perception of nursing diagnoses.

conclusionIt is recommended that other games similar to Taboo should be added to educational methods using gamification and experimental research should be conducted on these issues.

Indexed as

MotivationNursing diagnosesNursing studentsTaboo game

Identifiers

PMID41943125
PMCPMC13245085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.