Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41943095›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2026

Quilting sutures versus conventional closure after modified radical mastectomy with axillary dissection: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with pre-specified subgroups by quilting extent.

Wajahat Mirza, Mehak Ejaz Khan, Hania Iqbal, Alishbah Khan, Muhammad Bilal Moeen-Ud-Din, Hadi Mohammad Khan

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wajahat MirzaShifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Sector H-8/4, Islamabad, Pakistan. wajahatmirza.clinicalresearch@gmail.com.
Mehak Ejaz KhanResident General Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Hania IqbalResident General Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Alishbah KhanResident General Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Bilal Moeen-Ud-DinDepartment of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Hadi Mohammad KhanDepartment of General Surgery & Surgical Oncology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative seroma is the most frequent complication of modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Quilting sutures mechanically obliterate the dead space between the mastectomy flaps and chest wall; however, prior syntheses included heterogeneous breast procedures. We evaluated quilting versus conventional closure after MRM with ALND using only randomized evidence.

methodsThe protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251237379). We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, and Google Scholar from inception to June 1, 2025, using reference list screening. Eligibility: Parallel-group RCTs enrolling adult women undergoing MRM (or equivalent total mastectomy) with level I–II ALND, comparing quilting/flap fixation versus conventional non-quilting closure; studies of breast-conserving surgery, immediate reconstruction/oncoplastic procedures, sentinel node-only surgery, and non-randomized designs were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened/extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2. Random-effects meta-analysis (REML with Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman adjustments) was used to synthesize risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD). A prespecified subgroup analysis compared aggressive dead space obliteration (pectoral-plus-axillary quilting and/or drain reduction) with standard pectoral quilting. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.

resultsSeven randomized controlled trials (1,412 patients) were included. Quilting significantly reduced seroma incidence (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.23–0.55; moderate-certainty evidence; ≈200 fewer seromas per 1,000 patients [95% CI 141–241 fewer]) and the need for aspiration (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.20–0.42; moderate-certainty evidence; ≈192 fewer patients requiring aspiration per 1,000 [95% CI 157–216 fewer]), and also reduced the number of aspirations (MD − 1.03, 95% CI − 1.58 to − 0.47) and total drainage volume (MD − 214 mL, 95% CI − 402 to − 27 mL). Quilting did not significantly affect drain removal duration, surgical site infection (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.39–1.32; ≈10 fewer SSIs per 1,000 [95% CI 10 more to 20 fewer]), or flap necrosis (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.32–1.32; ≈22 fewer flap necroses per 1,000 [95% CI 20 more to 43 fewer]). Subgroup analysis showed that both aggressive dead space obliteration (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.22–0.51) and standard pectoral quilting (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36–0.80) significantly reduced seroma without significant differences between the techniques (p = 0.89). Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.

conclusionsQuilting sutures provide a clinically meaningful reduction in postoperative seroma following modified radical mastectomy with axillary dissection and may help support smoother postoperative recovery pathways without compromising wound healing.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionMastectomy, Modified RadicalPostoperative ComplicationsSeromaSuturesSuture TechniquesAxillaFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical FlapsAxillary lymph node dissectionBreast cancer surgeryDead space obliterationFlap fixationGRADE assessmentMeta-analysisModified radical mastectomyPostoperative seromaQuilting suturesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41943095
PMCPMC13067721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.