ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Learning curve for robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe learning curve refers to the relationship between a learner's execution of a task and the number of attempts or time necessary to perform it in a predictable, reliable, and optimal fashion. The learner's competence in a task should improve over time as they execute the job more frequently. The present investigation aims to clarify the learning curve associated with robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
methodsConsecutive patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany, between 2021 and 2025 were prospectively screened for participation in this clinical study. All procedures were performed through a medial parapatellar approach, following a functional alignment strategy. Implantation was performed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations using the Smith & Nephew Legion Genesis II system with a posterior-stabilised polyethylene insert. Both femoral and tibial components were cemented with Palacos cement (Heraeus Medical GmbH, Wehrheim, Germany). Postoperative physiotherapy followed the standard institutional protocol. At hospital admission, demographic variables including age, body mass index (BMI), and sex were recorded. Operative time was documented for each procedure and defined as the interval from skin incision to completion of wound closure.
resultsThe first 200 robotic-assisted TKAs were monitored. 66% (112 of 200 patients) were women, and 47.5% (95 of 200 TKAs) were performed on the right side. The mean age of the patients was 68.6 ± 8.1 years, and their BMI was 28.6 kg/m². The exponential decay model revealed a characteristic learning curve, characterised by initial rapid gains followed by a plateau. The estimated asymptotic operative time was approximately 89.2 minutes, with a learning rate coefficient of 0.035. This implies that the majority of efficiency improvements occur early, but meaningful reductions persist beyond the 20th case. Block-wise comparisons supported the existence of an earlier functional learning threshold. Statistically significant reductions in operative time, compared with the first 10 cases, were observed from the 41st to 50th procedure block (p = 0.02), with stabilisation in the 90-minute range thereafter.
conclusionThe most efficient gains occur early, and operative times stabilise at around 90 minutes after approximately 40 procedures. REGISTRATION: German Registry of Clinical Trials (ID DRKS00030614).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.