Observational studyBMC medical education2026
Climbing the ladder of confidence: effects of the step ladder system on medical students' self-efficacy during a surgical clerkship.
Observational study in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelf-efficacy is a key factor in motivation, persistence, and performance in medical education. However, surgical clerkships often provide limited hands-on practice and inconsistent feedback, hindering students’ ability to recognize their learning progress or readiness. The Step Ladder System (SLS), a structured competency-based framework, was introduced to clarify expectations and support incremental learning by helping students visualize progress and document task achievements. This study examined changes in medical students’ self-efficacy during a surgical clerkship and investigated whether participation in the SLS was linked to self-efficacy growth.
methodsAn observational study using prospective and retrospective data was conducted among 24 sixth-year medical students who completed a four-week clerkship in gastroentintestinal and pediatric surgery at Tottori University in 2025. Self-efficacy was measured with the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) at the start and end of the rotation. SLS engagement was calculated as the total number of task entries submitted via the mobile app. Paired t-tests evaluated pre- and post-rotation changes, while binomial tests analyzed directional trends in ΔGSES.
resultsStandardized GSES scores increased significantly from pre- to post-clerkship (49.8 ± 11.0 to 53.8 ± 12.2; p = 0.009). Students with high SLS engagement were more likely to show positive rather than negative ΔGSES (p = 0.021), while no clear trend was observed in low-engagement students. Learners with lower baseline GSES showed a significant predominance of positive ΔGSES (p = 0.031).
conclusionsMedical students’ self-efficacy improved over the clerkship. The SLS is designed as a learner-facing scaffold that supports clarification of expectations and structured preparation, rather than a tool for summative competency assessment. The SLS may support this growth by clarifying expected learning targets and expectations, encouraging purposeful preparation, and providing clearer goals and structured mastery experiences. Although SLS engagement and the magnitude of ΔGSES were not proportional, greater engagement and lower initial self-efficacy were consistently associated with positive change, suggesting that structured task engagement influences self-efficacy through non-linear mechanisms. The SLS appears to be a feasible and potentially beneficial framework for learner-centered surgical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.