ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Ethical challenges in end-of-life cancer care: a qualitative study among health-care providers in Iran.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer is one of the most critical and ethically challenging health issues worldwide. Providing end-of-life care to cancer patients often places health-care providers in morally complex situations, where professional duties, cultural expectations, and legal–religious mandates intersect. Despite growing global interest in end-of-life ethics, there is limited understanding of how these challenges are experienced in culturally specific contexts such as Iran. This study aimed to explore the ethical challenges faced by health-care providers caring for cancer patients during the end-of-life stage.
methodsThis study employed a qualitative conventional content analysis approach. Data were collected between July 2024 and June 2025 in oncology and palliative care centers affiliated with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Fourteen participants—including physicians, nurses, psychologists, and psychiatrists—were selected through purposeful sampling with maximum variation. Data were gathered via semi-structured, in-depth interviews, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed inductively following the framework of Elo and Kyngäs (2008). Rigor and trustworthiness were ensured using Lincoln and Guba’s criteria of credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability.
resultsAnalysis yielded 237 initial codes, grouped into 14 categories, 6 sub-themes, and 3 themes: Deliberately Avoiding Telling the Truth, Decision-Making Immersed in Distress and Doubt, and Absence of Purposeful Coherence in the End-of-Life Care Trajectory. These findings illustrate how ethical practice in end-of-life care is shaped by the interplay of individual emotions, institutional limitations, and sociocultural norms.
conclusionEnd-of-life care for cancer patients in Iran is morally demanding and requires ethical, emotional, and institutional support for health-care providers. Reform efforts should include developing national ethical guidelines, establishing hospital ethics committees, enhancing communication and ethics training, and promoting cultural openness toward death and dying. These measures can foster compassionate, patient-centered, and ethically coherent care at the end of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.