ArticleBMC cancer2026
Preliminary modeling of brain metastases in breast cancer: a neural network approach to risk factor analysis.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer accounts for one third of cancer-related deaths in women and has complications such as bone and brain metastases in other organs. Investigating the factors influencing this disease and its associated metastases is particularly important for treatment trends. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the predictive risk factors and their risk scores for brain metastases in breast cancer patients.
methodsThis case-control study was conducted on breast cancer patients in two groups: those with (13 subjects) and those without (39 subjects) metastases, in two medical centres between the 2022–2024. The data of patients were obtained from their medical records. Chi-square tests, multivariable logistic regression, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, and a two-layer perceptron neural network model (NNM) with a hyperbolic tangent activation function were employed to compare differences and predict risk factors of brain metastasis. All data were analysed using SPSS v.28 software.
resultsIn univariable logistic regression analyses, among significant predictors i.e. younger age (≤ 40 years), HER2–HR+ status, tumor size, and lymph node involvement which inclufed in multivariable analysis younger age and HER2–HR+ status remained independently significant predictors of brain metastasis (BBM). A point-based scoring system with a cutoff of 8 achieved sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 62%, and with an overall discriminative ability of AUC = 0.88 (95% CI: 0.78–0.98, P < 0.001). Neural network analysis provided complementary insights by quantifying the relative importance of predictors. HER2-HR+ (100% relative importance) and progesterone receptor status (79% relative importance) emerged as the most influential variables. The model achieved an AUC of 0.843, with test accuracy of 91.7%. Internal validation confirmed moderate but consistent performance but some miscalibration due to sample size limitations.
conclusionThe scoring model developed in this study demonstrated acceptable sensitivity and specificity for predicting the occurrence of brain metastases in women with breast cancer. However, given the hospital-based design and relatively small sample size, the estimates may be unstable and should be interpreted with caution. These findings suggest that the proposed scoring system may serve as a preliminary tool for risk stratification, while highlighting the need for further refinement and validation in diverse patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.