ArticleBMC neurology2026
The impact of different care modes on the rehabilitation efficacy of acute ischemic stroke patients.
Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the differences of the risk of complications, functional rehabilitation, and hospitalization expenses between the ischemic stroke patients cared by their families or orderlies.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study. We collected a total of 443 patients with ischemic stroke. According to the different types of nursing staff, they were divided into family caregiving group and orderly caregiving group. Propensity Score Weighting (PSW) method was used to balance the baseline; The weighted logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk of pulmonary, urinary tract infection, diarrhea, falls, and pressure ulcer in different groups of patients. The functional rehabilitation indicators, including the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, Barthel score, muscle strength grade and hospitalization cost before discharge, were compared between the two groups by means of independent samples t test or Wilcoxon rank sum test, depending on the distribution characteristics of the data. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
results①There were no significant differences in the incidence of pulmonary, urinary tract infection, diarrhea and fall between the two groups. The family caregiving group had a lower risk of developing pressure ulcer. ②The proportion of patients with upper limb muscle strength of grade 3 or above in the family caregiving group (90.60%) was higher than that in the orderly caregiving group (82.26%). ③The hospitalization expenses of the family caregiving group, and the average daily hospitalization expenses were higher than those of the orderly caregiving group, respectively.
conclusionFamily caregiving is a protective factor for pressure ulcer in ischemic stroke patients.The patients in the family caregiving group had better upper limb muscle strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.