ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Risk factors for preterm birth and prolonged pregnancy following cervical cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency: a retrospective analysis and predictive model.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCervical insufficiency is one of the major risk factors for preterm birth. The efficacy of cervical cerclage (CC) in improving pregnancy outcomes remains controversial. This study aimed to compare obstetric outcomes between patients with cervical insufficiency who underwent CC and those who did not to determine the optimal cutoff point for preterm birth on the basis of fetal survival outcomes and to identify risk factors influencing preterm birth. Furthermore, we sought to analyze the determinants of pregnancy prolongation after CC and to develop predictive models using pregnancy prolongation as the endpoint.
methodsPatients who underwent CC intervention and those who declined it, were included. Following 1:1 propensity score matching, the duration from cervical insufficiency diagnosis to delivery and fetal survival outcomes were compared. On the basis of fetal survival status, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified 30.5 weeks as an exploratory cutoff for discriminating fetal survival within this cohort. Using pregnancy prolongation after CC as a continuous endpoint, linear regression analysis was conducted, and nomograms were constructed to assess predictive performance.
results133 pregnant women with cervical insufficiency who underwent CC were included and matched with 133 women who did not receive the procedure. CC significantly prolonged the gestational duration (P < 0.01) but did not improve fetal survival (P = 0.45). The neutrophil percentage was significantly greater in mothers who delivered preterm at the 30.5-week cutoff (P = 0.022), and this difference persisted at 32 and 37 weeks. Multivariate analysis indicated that both neutrophil and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were significantly associated with prolonged pregnancy (P < 0.05 for both). The nomogram model, which uses prolonged pregnancy as the endpoint, demonstrated good predictive performance (R²=0.49).
conclusionCerclage performance was associated with a longer gestational duration but was not significantly related to fetal survival outcomes. Inflammatory markers such as the neutrophil count and CRP level may help predict preterm labor and pregnancy prolongation following CC. The nomogram model based on preoperative characteristics demonstrated accurate predictive ability for fetal retention time. However, the ROC-derived gestational threshold and predictive models should be regarded strictly as exploratory, proof-of-concept findings requiring mandatory external validation before any clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.