Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41942943›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2026

Evaluation of the root canal sealing properties and removability of four bioceramic sealers using micro-computed tomographic.

Jimin Zhang, Yue Di, Weiwei Qiao, Miaomiao Li, Li Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jimin ZhangDepartment of Cariology and Endodontics I, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yue DiDepartment of Cariology and Endodontics I, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Weiwei QiaoDepartment of Cariology and Endodontics I, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Miaomiao LiDepartment of Cariology and Endodontics I, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Li WangDepartment of Cariology and Endodontics I, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. dentist-wang@whu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBioceramic sealers have been increasingly applied in endodontics due to their excellent sealing properties and biocompatibility. However, the sealing performance of different bioceramic sealers and their removability during re-treatment remain focal points of clinical concern. This study aimed to evaluate the root canal sealing performance and removability of four bioceramic sealers.

methodsOne hundred extracted human single-rooted premolars were randomly allocated into five experimental groups (n = 20) after standardized root canal preparation: SC1 (i-MTA SP), SC2 (C-root SP), SC3 (Neosealer Flo), SC4 (iRoot SP) using single-cone obturation, and warm vertical compaction (WVC) with AH-plus. Micro CT scans were performed at three distinct intervals (immediately, one-week, and one-month post-obturation) to quantify the percentage volume of voids (PVV). After one-year storage, sealer removal was performed using ProTaper Universal Retreatment system combined with ultrasonic agitation. Residual filling rate (RFR) was calculated via post-retreatment micro CT scan and reconstruction. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis H-test and the Friedman test, with the significance level set at 5% (p < 0.05).

resultsThe PVV at the same site exhibited no statistically significant differences between the groups at three distinct intervals. Immediately following the filling procedure, the PVV in the middle thirds of roots in the SC4 group was significantly less than that in the SC1 and WVC groups (p < 0.05). The PVV in the middle thirds was less than in the coronal thirds in the SC2 group, and the PVV in both the apical and middle thirds was less than in the coronal thirds in both the SC3 and SC4 groups (p < 0.05). One-week post-filling, the PVV in the middle thirds of roots in the SC2 group was less than that in the WVC group. The PVV in the middle thirds of roots in the SC3 group, apical and middle thirds of roots in both the SC2 and SC4 groups was less than coronal thirds (p < 0.05). One-month post-filling, the PVV in the apical thirds of roots in the SC1 group, middle thirds of roots in the SC3 group and apical and middle thirds of roots in both the SC2 and SC4 groups was less than coronal thirds of roots (p < 0.05). Post-retreatment analysis demonstrated significantly less RFR in SC1 apical thirds compared to SC4 (p < 0.05).

conclusionThe choice among the bioceramic sealers tested had no significant effect on the sealing quality of single‑cone obturation. Among the four bioceramic sealers evaluated, i MTA SP was more readily removed than iRoot SP.

Indexed as

CeramicsRoot Canal Filling MaterialsX-Ray MicrotomographyBicuspidHumansMaterials TestingRoot Canal ObturationRoot Canal PreparationRoot Canal Filling MaterialsBioceramic sealerMicro-CTRoot canal retreatmentSingle cone obturationWarm vertical compaction

Identifiers

PMID41942943
PMCPMC13196239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.