SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2026
Efficacy of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for critically Ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation: a trial sequential analysis and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious meta-analyses have yielded conflicting conclusions about video laryngoscopy (VL) efficacy in critically ill adults, often including heterogeneous populations (e.g., trainees) or non-emergency settings. This study addresses a critical knowledge gap by focusing exclusively on experienced operators in emergency intubations.
methodsWe updated our systematic review to include 18 RCTs (5,097 patients) published up to January 2026, exceeding prior meta-analyses (e.g., 12 RCTs in 2025). Novel subgroup analyses explored settings (ICU/ED/prehospital) and neuromuscular blockade (NMBAs) use. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was incorporated to assess evidence certainty.
resultsVideo laryngoscopy (VL) was associated with a significantly higher first-attempt success rate compared to direct laryngoscopy (DL) (risk ratio [RR] = 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–1.17; p < 0.0001), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 88%; 18 trials). The benefit appeared more pronounced in the ICU and ED settings. No significant differences were observed in intubation time (MD=-2.38, 95% CI [-5.86, 1.11]), mortality (RR=0.97, 95% CI [0.84, 1.11]), or hospital stay (MD=-0.17, 95% CI [-2.04, 1.71]). Subgroup analyses revealed greater VL efficacy with routine neuromuscular blockade use (RR = 1.11, P = 0.03) The trial sequential analysis indicated insufficient sample size for definitive conclusions.
conclusionVL enhances first-pass success in experienced hands, especially in ICUs. Larger trials are needed to confirm broader applicability. This study advances prior work by focusing on high-acuity settings and rigorous methodologic standards.
trial registrationThis review is registered with PROSPERO ( http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO , CRD42023458066).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.