ArticleBMC genomics2026
CNN4Essential: a convolutional neural network model for predicting bacterial gene essentiality based on multi-feature fusion.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurately identifying essential genes in bacteria is critical for understanding microbial biology and developing novel antibiotics. However, the heterogeneity of biological data poses a challenge for reliable prediction. This study aims to enhance prediction accuracy by integrating diverse biological features through a multi-feature fusion framework.
resultsThis study combined sequence data, gene annotations, protein–protein interaction networks, and subcellular localization information to construct a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based model, CNN4Essential. Feature importance was assessed using a random forest algorithm, and dimensionality reduction was performed with truncated singular value decomposition. The model was evaluated through intra-species prediction (INSP) and leave-a-species-out prediction (LASP) across 22 prokaryotic species. CNN4Essential achieved an average AUC of 0.884 in INSP, 0.726 in LASP, and 0.851 across all species, outperforming existing methods. Furthermore, predictions for Haemophilus influenzae were compared with known drug-target genes from DrugBank. A positive correlation between prediction scores and target gene matching rates was observed.
conclusionsThe integration of multi-source features with a deep learning model significantly improves bacterial essential gene prediction. CNN4Essential not only surpasses single-feature and shallow models in performance but also holds promise for identifying potential drug targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.