Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41942825›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026

"Academia Is a Very Unforgiving Space": A Qualitative Study of Challenges Faced by Under-represented Scholars in Biomedical Research.

Holly N Thomas, Marie K Norman, Hemika Vempalli, Megan Hamm, Gretchen E White, Natalia E Morone, Audrey J Murrell, Doris M Rubio, Nancy Gauvin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Holly N ThomasDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. thomashn@upmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3298-0202
Marie K NormanDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Hemika VempalliDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Megan HammDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Gretchen E WhiteDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Natalia E MoroneDepartment of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Audrey J MurrellDepartment of Business Administration, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Doris M RubioDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Nancy GauvinDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

LEADS 2.0R25GM116740 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RUBIO, DORIS M · 2015 to 2025
$4.6M
Research Supplements to Promote Diversity in Health-Related ResearchU01GM132133 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MORONE, NATALIA E., MURRELL, AUDREY JEANETTE · 2019 to 2023
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM116740NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM132133NIGMS NIH HHS U01GM132133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiversity on biomedical research teams may lead to higher quality research, but some groups remain under-represented (UR) on research teams. Evaluating the challenges that UR scholars in the health sciences face could inform policies that institutions could take to recruit and retain UR scholars.

objectiveWe used a large qualitative dataset to examine challenges in pursuing and persisting in research careers among UR postdoctoral and early-career faculty scholars participating in a randomized controlled trial.

designWe conducted 78 individual qualitative interviews. Most participants held MDs or PhDs and were Black, Hispanic, or biracial. Interviews used a semi-structured guide and were audio-recorded and transcribed. A team of investigators developed an initial codebook based on a subset of interviews, which was iteratively revised by the team. After a final codebook was agreed upon, codes were assigned to all data. Codes were grouped into themes and sub-themes, which were discussed by the team. We present key themes and illustrative quotes. KEY

resultsCareer challenges reported by UR scholars came from the culture of academia as well as from external factors. Academia culture challenges included demand for productivity and funding, bias and racism, competition and hierarchy, and the "secret rules" to the system. External challenges included financial stress, being an immigrant, and family demands. Responses to challenges could be positive, including making a career pivot, building resilience, finding one's community, or finding one's passion. Negative consequences to challenges included burnout, imposter syndrome, and low belongingness.

conclusionsChallenges faced by UR scholars can be both internal and external to the academy and can induce negative consequences among UR scholars, but some scholars also build resilience and find passion in the face of these challenges. Efforts to improve the culture of academia and to foster positive mentoring could help retain UR scholars in biomedical science.

Indexed as

academic medicinebiomedical research workforcecareer barriersdiversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)early-career investigatorsmentorshipqualitative researchretention in academiaunder-represented in medicine (UIM)workforce diversity

Identifiers

PMID41942825
PMCPMC13377628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.