Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41942807›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine - open2026

Time-Dependent Alterations in Walking Biomechanics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Compared with Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Ali Esmaeili, AmirAli Jafarnezhadgero, Heidar Sajedi, Elif Aydin, Tibor Hortobágyi, Urs Granacher

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ali EsmaeiliDepartment of Sport Biomechanics, Faculty of Educational Science and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
AmirAli JafarnezhadgeroDepartment of Sport Biomechanics, Faculty of Educational Science and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
Heidar SajediSport Science Faculty, Department of Movement and Training Sciences, Düzce University, Düzce, Turkey.
Elif AydinPhysical Education and Sports Department, Sport Science Faculty, Ardahan University, Ardahan, Turkey.
Tibor HortobágyiDepartment of Kinesiology, Hungarian University of Sports Science, Budapest, Hungary.
Urs GranacherDepartment of Sport and Sport Science, Exercise and Human Movement Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. Urs.Granacher@sport.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-813X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnee injuries involving the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are often treated through surgical care to restore knee joint stability. Despite surgical treatment, there is evidence of altered biomechanical gait characteristics for short-, mid-, and even long-term post ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

objectiveIn this systematic review with meta-analysis, we aimed to analyze lower extremity joint kinematics and kinetics recorded during walking in individuals with ACLR and determine the time course of recovery of gait biomechanics following ACLR.

methodsFive electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL]) were systematically searched for articles potentially eligible for inclusion from inception until January 2026. A PECOS (Participants: ACLR individuals aged ≥ 18; Exposure: ACL surgery; Comparators: healthy controls; Outcomes: lower limb kinematics and kinetics during the walking stance phase; and Study design: case control studies, case series, cross-sectional studies, randomized controlled trials [baseline], cohort studies) approach was applied to define inclusion and exclusion criteria. Using cross-sectional studies, gait biomechanics were assessed short- (0-<6 months), mid- (≥ 6-12 months), and long-term (≥ 12 months) post-surgery in ACLR patients versus healthy controls. Gait biomechanics assessed during the stance phase were extracted from the included articles. Between-group standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed using a random-effects model to elucidate the gait biomechanical differences between ACLR patients and healthy controls. The modified version of the Downs and Black checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies.

resultsThe initial search identified 3199 hits and according to a priori defined in-/exclusion criteria, 31 cross-sectional studies with males and females aged 17-55 years were eligible to be included. The mean methodological quality of all included studies was moderate (Downs and Black checklist score: 68%). Based on outcomes from 17 studies, lower peak knee flexion angles were noted during the stance phase of walking in ACLR patients compared to controls (small SMD=-0.50, 95% CI -0.77 to -0.22, p = 0.0004, I

conclusionsAfter ACLR, the observed reduction in peak knee flexion angle suggests a walking pattern with a straighter knee, or a less erect gait posture, which can persist for ≥ 12 months post surgery. The lower sagittal plane knee moments suggest a less dynamic gait, characterized by reduced muscular demand. The small deviations in gait biomechanics from normal are lasting but inconsistent between studies. While associated with long-term outcomes like post-traumatic osteoarthritis, the direct clinical relevance of these specific gait changes requires further study.

Indexed as

ACL surgeryKinematicsKineticsWalking

Identifiers

PMID41942807
PMCPMC13053734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.