Trial reportEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2026
Comparative evaluation of saturated and 10% potassium iodide in reducing silver diamine fluoride staining under RMGIC restorations in primary teeth.
Trial report in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSilver diamine fluoride (SDF) effectively arrests caries lesions, but its major drawback is staining. Potassium iodide (KI) has been suggested to minimise this effect. The present clinical trial compared 10% KI and saturated KI in reducing SDF-induced staining under resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) restorations in primary teeth.
methodA triple-blinded, parallel-design randomised clinical trial was conducted on 46 primary teeth meeting standardised ICDAS criteria to eliminate selection bias. Teeth were randomly assigned to Group A (10% KI) or Group B (saturated KI). Changes in staining were quantified using mean grey values at baseline and follow-up intervals. Secondary outcomes included parental satisfaction assessed through a structured questionnaire.
resultA significant difference in mean grey value change was observed between groups at the 15 day interval, with saturated KI showing greater stain reduction. However, no significant differences were found at subsequent follow-ups. Parental satisfaction related to aesthetic outcomes varied between the two groups.
conclusionThis is one of the first clinical studies, beyond predominantly in vitro evidence, to evaluate KI formulations for SDF stain reduction under RMGIC restorations. Neither 10% KI nor saturated KI provided consistent long-term aesthetic benefits, although short-term improvements and positive parental acceptance were noted. Future trials with larger samples and adjunctive approaches are warranted to identify more reliable strategies for managing SDF-related discolouration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41942804What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.