ArticleLearning & behavior2026
Behavioral characteristics of rapid visual categorization learning in domestic chicks.
Article in Learning & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to categorize objects and events is a highly adaptive property common among organisms with different nervous systems. Using a bead floor learning paradigm, we systematically analyzed the parameters that enable the rapid formation of a new visual category in young domestic chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). In one short training session, newborn chicks successfully learned to distinguish food crumbs from the unfamiliar food-like plastic beads and group the latter into a new category of inedible objects. We found that a critical prerequisite for the category acquisition was the occurrence of several non-reinforced exploratory pecks, which served as a behavioral driver of categorization. The presence of food or previous association of the learning context with food reinforcement was not required for the formation of the new "inedible object" category. Chicks were also capable of forming two categories - edible and inedible objects - simultaneously, demonstrating parallel categorization abilities. Analysis of object features showed that changes in the shape or size of beads interfered with their generalization, whereas changes in color did not disrupt assignment of beads of a new color to a previously existing category. Our results provide an ecologically valid model of rapid visual categorization learning in chicks that allows integration of classical avian categorization paradigms with modern neurobiological methods, thus establishing a powerful framework for analysis of dynamics and neural mechanisms of categorical memory formation in avian species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41942801What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.