Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41942793›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2026

Feasibility of Mobile Phone-Based Virtual Reality as a Non-pharmacologic Acute Procedural Pain Management Intervention in an Inpatient Burn Center.

Mariel Emrich, Andrew A McAleavey, Katarzyna Wyka, Andrew Greenway, Abraham P Houng, Philip H Chang, Constance Zhou, JoAnn Difede

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04685486 (Virtual Reality for Pain Management in Burn Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04685486 narecruitingnot on this map

Virtual Reality for Pain Management in Burn Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2018 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsPainArmsVirtual Reality
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mariel EmrichDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA. mae2050@med.cornell.edu.
Andrew A McAleaveyDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.
Katarzyna WykaDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.
Andrew GreenwayDepartment of Surgery, Trauma, Burns, and Acute and Critical Care Division, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.
Abraham P HoungThe Burn Center at Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Livingston, USA.
Philip H ChangDepartment of Surgery, Trauma, Burns, and Acute and Critical Care Division, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.
Constance ZhouWeill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, USA.
JoAnn DifedeDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn patients often experience severe procedural pain throughout hospitalization, and poorly controlled pain is a significant predictor of long-term psychological adjustment post-injury. Virtual Reality (VR) presents a promising adjunctive approach to pharmacological analgesics by redirecting patients' attention away from painful stimuli using immersive, multidimensional environments. Recent technological advances have made VR more affordable, portable, and hands-free permitting the head-mounted display to be easily transported with minimal set up, particularly conducive to hospital environments. This proof-of-concept randomized pilot trial compared VR-enhanced distraction to treatment as usual (TAU) during painful procedures (e.g., wound dressing changes) in hospitalized burn patients. Of 51 patients approached, 15 adults enrolled and 100% completed the study. VR was rated as highly enjoyable (M = 77.5/100) and moderately immersive (M = 63.3/100) with minimal side effects. Descriptively, VR participants demonstrated smaller increases in peri-procedural pain and anxiety relative to TAU and reported reduced cognitive pain during the procedure (i.e., time thinking about pain; M = 33.3 vs. 94.0). Within six hours post-procedure, fewer VR participants required pharmacologic analgesia compared to TAU participants (50.0% vs. 71.4%). Preliminary data indicate that portable VR appears to be a highly feasible and acceptable adjunct to traditional pharmacologic interventions for acute procedural pain in an inpatient burn center. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04685486.

Indexed as

BurnsCell PhonePain ManagementProcedural PainVirtual RealityVirtual Reality Exposure TherapyAdultBurn UnitsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsAcute pain managementBurn patientsNon-pharmacologic interventionsProcedural painVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41942793
PMCPMC13226390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.