ArticleCommunications biology2026
Pollination and dispersal networks in the Amazonian tree flora.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disturbance Mosaics Shape Multiple Pollinator Taxa Across Spatial and Temporal Scales in Fire-Managed Forests.Global change biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We collected flower-visiting data for 5,201 Amazonian trees species, corresponding to 50% of all known tree species and 94% of all estimated individuals in Amazonia. Bees are the most common flower-visitors responsible for 74% of all studied tree genera and 74.1% of all individual trees, followed by generalist flower-visitors (39.2%). Sixteen tree genera make up 50% of all interactions between tree genera and their flower-visitors. Two of those: Inga, Miconia, each provide more than 2% of all interactions at genus level while six: Protium, Eschweilera, Inga, Pouteria, Ocotea, and Virola each provide more than 2% of all interactions at the estimated tree population level, underscoring the importance of these tree genera in the forest. Forty hyperdominant genera are responsible for half of the fruit resources of the Amazonian disperser community. Nearly 80% of these Amazonian tree species rely on animals for both pollination and seed dispersal, and less than 1% are free from animal involvement in these key life stages. This strong biotic dependence highlights a critical point: animal-mediated interactions are not peripheral but central to the maintenance, regeneration, and spatial structure of Amazonian forests, which makes halting of defaunation in these forests a priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.