SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Clinical efficacy of neuromodulation in isolated dystonia: A systematic review of motor function improvement.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIsolated dystonia is a disabling movement disorder for which neuromodulation represents a key therapeutic option in medically refractory cases. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is the current standard target, while subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation and non-invasive techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been investigated as alternative or adjunctive approaches.
objectivesTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation techniques for motor symptom improvement in adults with isolated dystonia.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library (January 2007–December 2020) was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Randomized and non-randomized clinical studies assessing motor outcomes after GPi-DBS, STN-DBS, rTMS or tDCS were included. Risk of bias was assessed using design-specific tools.
resultsTwelve studies met the inclusion criteria. GPi-DBS provided consistent and sustained motor improvement across dystonia phenotypes with an acceptable safety profile. STN-DBS showed comparable efficacy in selected cohorts, with faster early clinical response and lower energy consumption, although the lack of prospective head-to-head trials prevents definitive conclusions. Non-invasive techniques (rTMS and tDCS) yielded modest but clinically meaningful benefits, particularly when combined with structured rehabilitation. Study heterogeneity precluded quantitative synthesis.
conclusionsNeuromodulation is an effective and safe treatment for isolated dystonia. GPi-DBS remains the best-supported approach, STN-DBS a promising option in selected patients, and non-invasive techniques a potential adjunct. Prospective comparative trials and standardized, phenotype-driven strategies are still needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.