Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41942696›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Enhancing polygenic risk prediction by modeling quantile-specific genetic effects.

Suin Kim, Taewan Goo, Taesung Park, Mira Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suin KimDepartment of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Taewan GooInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Taesung ParkDepartment of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Mira ParkDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Eulji University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. mira@eulji.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant RS-2025-00514649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) quantify an individual's genetic susceptibility to complex traits and diseases. Conventional PRSs, which are based on linear models, perform poorly for phenotypes with skewed distributions or with genetic effects that vary across the distribution. We propose a quantile regression-based PRS (QPRS) that can capture quantile-specific genetic effects. While existing PRSs provide only a single score, QPRS models genetic influences at multiple quantiles of the phenotype, thereby enhancing predictive performance by utilizing these multiple scores as covariates. We evaluate the performance of our method through both simulations and a real-data application. In simulations, QPRS significantly reduces the mean squared error compared to the linear-based PRS, both in the presence of variance quantitative trait loci and outliers. For real data analysis, we use data from Korea Genome and Epidemiology Study to evaluate predictive performance. We consider two prediction tasks: continuous outcomes (triglycerides and glucose level) and a binary outcome (diabetes status, derived from glucose level). QPRS demonstrates consistent improvements over conventional mean-based PRSs across both prediction tasks.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseModels, GeneticMultifactorial InheritanceComputer SimulationGenetic Risk ScoreGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrediction AlgorithmsQuantitative Trait LociDistributional heterogeneityGenetic predictionGenome-wide association studyPolygenic risk scoreQuantile regression

Identifiers

PMID41942696
PMCPMC13061970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.